Ken wrote:

>   I again urge the involved parties to obtain informed information on
> this subject. Specificaly of interest to your case would be sections
> 2.8 and 2.9 at the URL listed below where it details a publishers fair
> and reasonable right to publish material without the copyright holders
> consent for educational purposes.

The document clearly states "NON-PROFIT educational purposes", which is
very different from "educational purposes".  For example, it could be
a teacher using the image to illustrate a lesson, as a slide, or printed
in something that the students get *at cost*.

The Prenhall book is hardly in the "non-profit" category...

Fabien.

Post a reply to this message